Current:Home > ContactWhy doctors pay millions in fees that could be spent on care -ApexWealth
Why doctors pay millions in fees that could be spent on care
View
Date:2025-04-14 02:13:48
Imagine if each time your wages were deposited in your bank account, your employer deducted a fee of 1.5% to 5% to provide the money electronically. That, increasingly, is what health insurers are imposing on doctors. Many insurers, after whittling down physicians' reimbursements, now take an additional cut if the doctor prefers — as almost all do — to receive funds electronically rather than via a paper check.
Such fees have become routine in American health care in recent years, according to an investigation by ProPublica published on Monday, and some medical clinics say they'll seek to pass those costs on to patients. Almost 60% of medical practices said they were compelled to pay fees for electronic payment at least some of the time, according to a 2021 survey.
With more than $2 trillion a year of medical claims paid electronically, these fees likely add up to billions of dollars that could be spent on care but instead are going to insurers and middlemen.
Congress had intended the opposite to happen. When lawmakers passed the Affordable Care Act in 2010, they encouraged the use of electronic payments in health care. Direct deposits are faster and easier to process than checks, requiring less labor for doctors and insurers alike. "The idea was to lower costs," says Robert Tennant of the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange, an industry group that advises the federal government.
When the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services created rules for electronic payments in 2012, the agency predicted that shifting from paper to electronic billing would save $3 billion to $4.5 billion over 10 years.
That's not how it played out. CMS quickly began hearing complaints from doctors about fees. An industry of middlemen had begun sprouting up, processing payments for insurers and skimming fees off the top. Sometimes they shared a portion of the fees with insurers, too. The middlemen companies say they offer value in return for their fees and insist that it's easy to opt out of their services, but doctors say otherwise.
CMS responded to the complaints in August 2017 by publishing a notice on its website reminding the health care industry that electronic payments were not a profit-making opportunity. The agency cited a long-standing rule that prohibited charging fees. (Technically, the government banned "fees or costs in excess of the fees or costs for normal telecommunications," such as the cost of sending an email.) The rule had been on the books since 2000, but the insurers and their middlemen weren't abiding by it.
Within six months of that pronouncement, however, CMS suddenly removed the fee notice from its website. The decision baffled doctors such as Alex Shteynshlyuger, a New York urologist who has made it his mission to battle the fees. Shteynshlyuger began filing voluminous public records requests with CMS to obtain documents showing why the agency reversed course.
The records that he eventually obtained, which he shared with ProPublica, provided a rare nearly day-by-day glimpse of how one industry lobbyist got CMS to back down.
The lobbyist, Matthew Albright, used to work at the CMS division that implemented the electronic payment rule. In fact, he was its chief author. He had since moved on to Zelis, a company that handles electronic payments for over 700 insurers and other "payers." Internal CMS emails show that Albright protested the notice prohibiting fees and demanded that CMS revise the document.
Over the ensuing months, as ProPublica outlined, Albright used an artful combination of cajoling, argument and legal threat. He claimed the rule against fees applied only to direct transactions between insurers and doctors, but electronic payments involved middlemen such as Zelis, so the prohibition didn't apply. CMS ultimately dropped its ban on fees.
The move benefited Zelis and other payment processors. The losers were doctors, who say they're often not given an option to get paid electronically without agreeing to a fee. In March, for example, when Shteynshlyuger called Zelis to enroll in electronic payments from one insurer, a Zelis rep quoted him a fee of 2.5% for each payment. When he complained, the call got transferred to another rep who said, "The lowest we can go is 2.1%."
Zelis said in a statement that it "removes many of the obstacles that keep providers from efficiently initiating, receiving, and benefitting from electronic payments. We believe in provider choice and actively support their ability to move between payment methods based upon differing needs and preferences." Zelis did not respond to detailed questions about Albright's interactions with CMS or make him available to discuss that topic.
CMS said that it "receives feedback from a wide range of stakeholders on an ongoing basis" to understand "where guidance and clarification of existing policy may be needed."
As for Shteynshlyuger's he's still on a quest to help doctors avoid electronic payment fees. Meanwhile, his inability to persuade the insurance middlemen often leads him to a step that is the antithesis of efficiency: Whenever he's asked to pay a fee for an electronic payment, he requests a paper check instead.
Read the full story of the rise of electronic payment fees in ProPublica's investigation.
This story comes from ProPublica, a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive their biggest stories as soon as they're published.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Van Zweden earned $1.5M as New York Philharmonic music director in 2022-23
- YouTuber Paul Harrell Announces His Own Death at 58
- Consumer spending data looks solid, but some shoppers continue to struggle
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Travis, Jason Kelce talk three-peat, LeBron, racehorses on 'New Heights' podcast
- Joaquin Phoenix on 'complicated' weight loss for 'Joker' sequel: 'I probably shouldn't do this again'
- Questions swirl around attempted jailbreak in Congo as families of victims demand accountability
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Olivia Munn Shares Health Update Amid Breast Cancer Journey
Ranking
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Report: Mountain Valley Pipeline test failure due to manufacturer defect, not corrosion
- Love Is Blind's Shaina Hurley Shares She Was Diagnosed With Cancer While Pregnant
- A utility investigated but didn’t find a gas leak before a fatal Maryland house explosion
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Rail Ridge wildfire in Oregon consumes over 60,000 acres; closes area of national forest
- A prosecutor asks for charges to be reinstated against Alec Baldwin in the ‘Rust’ case
- College football's cash grab: Coaches, players, schools, conference all are getting paid.
Recommendation
Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
Panic on the streets of Paris for Australian Olympic breaker
Travis Kelce's Reps Respond to Alleged Taylor Swift Breakup Plan
NYC teacher grazed by bullet fired through school window
McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
Keith Urban Describes Miley Cyrus' Voice as an Ashtray—But In a Good Way
Apalachee High School shooting press conference: Watch live as officials provide updates
Families claim Oregon nurse replaced fentanyl drips with tap water in $303 million lawsuit