Current:Home > ScamsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -ApexWealth
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-12 10:30:32
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (3162)
Related
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Do fireworks affect air quality? Here's how July Fourth air pollution has made conditions worse
- World Is Not on Track to Meet UN’s 2030 Sustainable Energy Goals
- 5 Seconds of Summer Guitarist Michael Clifford Expecting First Baby With Wife Crystal Leigh
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Why Samuel L. Jackson’s Reaction to Brandon Uranowitz’s Tony Win Has the Internet Talking
- Climate Change Ravaged the West With Heat and Drought Last Year; Many Fear 2021 Will Be Worse
- A $20 Uniqlo Shoulder Bag Has Gone Viral on TikTok: Here’s Why It Exceeds the Hype
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Fossil Fuels on Trial: Where the Major Climate Change Lawsuits Stand Today
Ranking
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- How 12 Communities Are Fighting Climate Change and What’s Standing in Their Way
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $280 Crossbody Bag for Just $65
- Bud Light sales continue to go flat during key summer month
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- A Shantytown’s Warning About Climate Change and Poverty from Hurricane-Ravaged Bahamas
- Giant Icebergs Are Headed for South Georgia Island. Scientists Are Scrambling to Catch Up
- Boy, 7, shot and killed during Florida jet ski dispute; grandfather wounded while shielding child
Recommendation
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
JoJo Siwa Details How Social Media Made Her Coming Out Journey Easier
Power Companies vs. the Polar Vortex: How Did the Grid Hold Up?
Khloe Kardashian Gives Update on Nickname for Her Baby Boy Tatum
2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
Net-Zero Energy Homes Pay Off Faster Than You Think—Even in Chilly Midwest
Ohio groups submit 710,131 signatures to put abortion rights amendment on November ballot
John Berylson, Millwall Football Club owner, dead at 70 in Cape Cod car crash