Current:Home > MyIowa governor signs bill that gives state authority to arrest and deport some migrants -ApexWealth
Iowa governor signs bill that gives state authority to arrest and deport some migrants
View
Date:2025-04-12 19:41:51
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — It will be a state crime for a person to be in Iowa if previously denied admission to or removed from the United States under a bill signed into law by Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday.
The law, which takes effect July 1, has elevated anxiety in Iowa’s immigrant communities and has prompted questions among legal experts and law enforcement on how it will be enforced. It mirrors part of a Texas law that is currently blocked in court.
In Iowa and across the country, Republican leaders have accused President Joe Biden of neglecting his responsibilities to enforce federal immigration law, leading Republican governors to send troops to Texas and legislatures to propose a variety of state-level strategies.
“The Biden Administration has failed to enforce our nation’s immigration laws, putting the protection and safety of Iowans at risk,” Reynolds said in a statement after signing the bill. “This bill gives Iowa law enforcement the power to do what he is unwilling to do: enforce immigration laws already on the books.”
After the Legislature passed the bill, Des Moines Police Chief Dana Wingert told The Associated Press in an email in March that immigration status does not factor into the department’s work to keep the community safe. He said the force is “not equipped, funded or staffed” to take on responsibilities that are the federal government’s.
“Simply stated, not only do we not have the resources to assume this additional task, we don’t even have the ability to perform this function,” Wingert said.
Shawn Ireland, president of the Iowa State Sheriffs and Deputies Association and a deputy sheriff in Linn County, also said in a March email that law enforcement officials would have to consult with county attorneys for guidance on implementation and enforcement.
The Iowa legislation, like the Texas law, could mean criminal charges for people who have outstanding deportation orders or who have previously been removed from or denied admission to the U.S. Once in custody, migrants could either agree to a judge’s order to leave the U.S. or be prosecuted.
The judge’s order must identify the transportation method for leaving the U.S. and a law enforcement officer or Iowa agency to monitor migrants’ departures. Those who don’t leave could face rearrest under more serious charges.
The Texas law is stalled in court after a challenge from the U.S. Department of Justice that says it conflicts with the federal government’s immigration authority.
The bill in Iowa faces the same questions of implementation and enforcement as the Texas law, since deportation is a “complicated, expensive and often dangerous” federal process, said immigration law expert Huyen Pham of Texas A&M School of Law.
In the meantime, Iowa’s immigrant community groups are organizing informational meetings and materials to try to answer people’s questions. They’re also asking local and county law enforcement agencies for official statements, as well as face-to-face meetings.
At one community meeting in Des Moines, 80 people gathered and asked questions in Spanish, including: “Should I leave Iowa?”
Others asked: “Is it safe to call the police?” “Can Iowa police ask me about my immigration status?” And: “What happens if I’m racially profiled?”
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Coal Is On Its Way Out in Indiana. But What Replaces It and Who Will Own It?
- Russian fighter pilots harass U.S. military drones in Syria for second straight day, Pentagon says
- Why the proposed TikTok ban is more about politics than privacy, according to experts
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- Amy Schumer Trolls Sociopath Hilaria Baldwin Over Spanish Heritage Claims & von Trapp Amount of Kids
- Harris and Ocasio-Cortez Team up on a Climate ‘Equity’ Bill, Leaving Activists Hoping for Unity
- A $1.6 billion lawsuit alleges Facebook's inaction fueled violence in Ethiopia
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Warming Trends: A Baby Ferret May Save a Species, Providence, R.I. is Listed as Endangered, and Fish as a Carbon Sink
Ranking
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- U.S. destroys last of its declared chemical weapons
- Investors prefer bonds: How sleepy government bonds became the hot investment of 2022
- Elon Musk is using the Twitter Files to discredit foes and push conspiracy theories
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- In defense of gift giving
- As Rooftop Solar Rises, a Battle Over Who Gets to Own Michigan’s Renewable Energy Future Grows
- Tamra Judge Wore This Viral Lululemon Belt Bag on Real Housewives of Orange County
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Trump’s New Clean Water Act Rules Could Affect Embattled Natural Gas Projects on Both Coasts
Can shark repellents avoid your becoming shark food?
A solution to the housing shortage?
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
Mass layoffs are being announced by companies. If these continue, will you be ready?
Warming Trends: Green Grass on the Ski Slopes, Covid-19 Waste Kills Animals and the Virtues and Vulnerabilities of Big Old Trees
Across America, Five Communities in Search of Environmental Justice